CHAPTER
2
The
principle that can be used to solve this problem is the doctrine of ultra
vires. This doctrine is one way how courts review decisions made by public
bodies. It can be used to determine whether the subsidiary legislation made by public
bodies is valid or not. Ultra vires means beyond the power and it can be
classified into three which are procedural, substantive and extended ultra
vires. Furthermore, procedure in making subsidiary legislative can be
classified as mandatory and directory. Mandatory means SL must need
consultation with specific body, opportunity for affected persons to file for
objections and pre-publication of draft rules. Directory means public bodies
need not follow the procedure; non-compliance with the procedure will not make
the SL invalid. Besides that, substantive can be refers as scope, extent and
range of power conferred by the statue to make SL. It can be classified as
parent act ultra vires the federal constitution, SL ultra vires the federal
constitution and SL ultra vires the parent act. Extend ultra vires also can be
classified as retrospective effect, financial levy, outer clauses and
reasonable.
CHAPTER
3
The
principle that can be used to solve this problem is the rules of natural
justice. This rule is a procedural safeguard against improper exercise of power
by a public body. It can be used to determine whether the administrator has
actually complied with legal procedure before taking action or making any
decision against someone. Rule of natural justice concern with ‘’process’’ that
is used by administrator in making decision against an individual and it can be
classified into two which are audi alteram partem and nemo judex in causa sua.
In order to determine whether the administrator has made a valid decision,
these two elements must be observed; if not decision can be challenged in court
of law. Audi alteram partem means right of hearing or heard divide to two
categories which are hearing and notice.
Hearing classified to rebuttal, acceptance and disclosure while notice
classified to charge and time. Plus, nemo judex in causa sua means rules
against bias that divide to three categories which are pecuniary bias, personal
bias and policy bias.
3
CHAPTER
4
The
principle that can be used to solve this problem is the discretionary power.
Discretionary power is the power that conferred upon administrative bodies by
the legislator via the statute. It involves right to choose between more than
one possible course of action on which there is a room for reasonable people to
hold differing opinion as which is to be preferred.’’ – Per Lord Diplock in
Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan.
Discretionary power divides into procedure, substantive and extended ultra
vires. Procedures refer to any decision taken by authority that fails to
observe the procedure norms stated by statue, and then decision can be
challenged. Substantive refer to any decision taken by authority that exceed
the power conferred by the statue in exercising their discretion. Extended can
be refer as any decision taken by authority that abuse discretionary power or
failure to exercise discretionary power. Abuse discretionary power divided to
mala fide, irrelevant consideration, improper purpose, colourable exercise, unreasonableness,
vague purpose and misdirection of fact and law. Failure to exercise
discretionary power divided to acting under dictation, acting mechanically and
fettering discretion.
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan